 |
|---|
MH17: как и кто? |
Привет, Гость! Войдите или зарегистрируйтесь.
Вы здесь » MH17: как и кто? » Против официальной версии » Макс + Яна MH17 - 5 years onv
120
4.5.1 Audio 1, Track 1 Voices
Figure 4.5.1.1: Audio1, Track 1 - Bezler’s Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio cannot be accepted for Voice ID analysis
Right Channel – Audio-1, Track-1
Right Channel – Audio-1, Track 1 – Bezler’s Audio Waveform (Entire Signal)
121
Figure 4.5.1.2: Audio1, Track1 - V. Geranin Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio cannot be accepted for Voice ID analysis
Left Channel – Audio 1, Track 1
Left Channel – Audio 1, Track 1 – V.Geranin’s Audio Waveform (Entire Signal)
122
4.5.2 Audio 2, Track 2 Voices
Figure 4.5.2.1: Audio 2, Track 2 - Grek’s Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio cannot be accepted for Voice ID analysis
Audio 2, Track 2 - Grek’s
voice Waveform (Entire
Signal)
-
123
Figure 4.5.2.2: Audio 2, Track 2 - Major’s Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio cannot be accepted for Voice ID analysis
Audio 2, Track 2 - Major’s
voice Waveform (Entire
Signal)
124
4.5.3 Audio 2, Track3 Voices
Figure 4.5.3.1: Audio 2, Track 3 - Grek’s Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio cannot be accepted for Voice ID analysis
Audio 2, Track 3 - Grek’s
voice Waveform (Entire
Signal)
125
Figure 4.5.3.2: Audio 2, Track 3 - Major’s Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio cannot be accepted for Voice ID analysis
Audio 2, Track 3 - Major’s
voice Waveform (Entire
Signal)
126
4.5.4 Audio 2, Track 4 Voices
Figure 4.5.4.1: Audio 2, Track 4 - Grek’s Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio can be partially accepted for Voice ID analysis
Audio 2, Track 4 - Major’s
voice Waveform (Entire
Signal)
127
Figure 4.5.4.2: Audio 2, Track 4 - Major’s Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio cannot be accepted for Voice ID analysis
Audio 2, Track 4 - Grek’s
voice Waveform (Entire
Signal)
128
4.5.5 Audio 3, Track 5 Voices
Figure 4.5.5.1: Audio 3 - Kozitsyn’s Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio cannot be accepted for Voice ID analysis
Right Channel - Audio 3, Track 5 has Kozitsyn’s
Voice
Right Channel –
Audio 3, Track 5 –
Kozitsyn’s voice
(Selected area)
129
Figure 4.5.5.2: Audio 3 – Militant -1 Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio cannot be accepted for Voice ID analysis
Left Channel - Audio 3, Track 5 has Militant 1’s
and Militant 2’s Voice
Left Channel – Audio
3, Track 5 – Militant
1’s Voice (Selected
area)
130
Figure 4.5.3: Audio 3 – Militant -2 Voice Signal Characteristics - Audio cannot be accepted for Voice ID analysis
Left Channel - Audio 3, Track 5 has Militant 1’s
and Militant 2’s Voice
Left Channel – Audio
3, Track 5 – Militant
2’s Voice (Selected
area)
131
5.0 5.0 Video 2 - MH17 crash leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата
разговоров ополчения ДНР..mp4
Figure 5.1: MH17 crash leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата разговоров ополчения ДНР..mp4- Waveform Shows
there were no edits seen in the audio
Video 2 audio
stream sound wave
132
Figure 5.2: MH17 crash leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата разговоров ополчения ДНР..mp4- detailed Audio
Properties
Video duration is 8:03.100
and audio sample is
44100Hz
133
Figure 5.3: MH17 crash leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата разговоров ополчения ДНР..mp4– Waveform and
Spectral Frequency Background Noise Shows there were no edits in the audio.
There were many pauses/mute in the audio stream of
the video. Pauses were reasonable in the audio
environment
134
Figure 5.4: MH17 crash leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата разговоров ополчения ДНР..mp4– Waveform and
Spectral Frequency Background Noise Shows there no were edits in the audio., audio was paused and played by the speaker.
There were many pauses/mute in the audio stream of the video. Pause/mute
were reasonable in the audio because the speaker was explaining.
135
Figure 5.5: MH17 crash leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата разговоров ополчения ДНР..mp4– Waveform and
Spectral Frequency Background Noise Shows there were edits in the audio., audio was paused and played by speaker.
There were many pauses/mute in the audio stream of the video. Pause/mute
were reasonable in the audio because the speaker was explaining.
136
Figure 5.6: MH17 crash leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата разговоров ополчения ДНР..mp4– Waveform and
Spectral Frequency Background Noise Shows there were edits in the audio., audio was paused and played by speaker.
There were many pauses/mute in the audio stream of the video. Pause/mute
were reasonable in the audio because the speaker was explaining.
137
Figure 5.7: Signal Properties MH17 crash leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата разговоров ополчения ДНР..mp4
Audio stream of Video 2
Duration: 08:06:202 sec
Channels: 2
Data Size: 85766144 bytes
138
Figure 5.8: Voice Signal Analysis MH17 crash leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата разговоров ополчения ДНР..mp4
Note: Analysis of Video 2 was done at high level, focus was on Video 1 audio tracks.
Audio stream of Video 2 details ~ 9345
hz and SNR 3300 Hz
139
[b]6.0 Summary[/b]
In conclusion, the first and foremost analysis on the video files is the authenticity of the both videos
as listed in Table 1.5.1 and Table 2.1.1. In YouTube channel, Video 1 - `SSU, Radio interception of
conversations between terrorists, "Boeing-777" plane crash’ showing that it was published on the 17th
Jul 2014 but the encoded/created date was showing 01/11/2018 ~ 02:44:30 (UTC) which is after ~ 4 years
3 months of MH17 fatal incident happened (17/7/2014). Video 1 date modified (in YouTube header) is
also showing last modified on 1st Nov 2018 (Refer Figure 2.1.1.3). This clearly means that this video is not
genuine and had been tampered and can’t be accepted as digital evidence to relied upon. Refer to Section
1.8 showing the Timeline.
In Video 2 - 'MH17 crash: leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата
разговоров ополчения ДНР.', the published date is showing as 17th Jul 2014 and last modified date (in
YouTube header) showing last modified on 4th Aug 2014 (Refer Figure 2.1.2.3). This also showing the video
is also considered not genuine. Refer to Section 1.8 showing the Timeline.
Forensic verification analysis of the audios in Video 1, there was no any metadata showing any
details of the audio tracks original source of the recorded audio tracks, thus making the audio tracks in
this Video 1’s audio stream cannot be trusted/relied upon, not genuine, as it has no authenticity and
cannot be accepted as any kind of digital evidence.
The audio forensic analysis on the main audio streams of Video 1 showing there are total of 3
separate audios files with 5 tracks of audio conversation between militants were aired in Video 1 audio
stream as listed below. Refer to Table 3.2.1 and Figure 4.4 showing the details of Audio tracks.
i. Audio 1, Track 1 - Time Frame: 0:18.3 – 0:36.1 (a mono channel recorded audio track)
ii. Audio 2, Track-2 - Time Frame: 0.43.3 - 0.52.9 (a stereo channel recorded audio track)
iii. Audio 2, Track-3 - Time Frame: 0.54.5 - 1:08.0 (a stereo channel recorded audio track)
iv. Audio 2, Track-4 -Time Frame: 0.54.5 - 1:08.0 (a stereo channel recorded audio track)
v. Audio 3, Track-5 - Time Frame: 1:50 - 2:22.8 (a mono channel recorded audio track)
All the recorded audios tracks quality is very low, and the original source of the intercepted audio
remain unknown. The audio recorded tracks channel in Video 1 are inconsistent with some are mono
recorded audio and some are stereo recorded audio. This clearly showing that multiple source of the audio
140
track recorded were taken to composed into Video 1 audio stream. Refer to Table 3.1.2 showing Video 1
Audio Tracks Analysis.
Forensic analysis on these audio tracks spectral and noise floor showing there are several anomalies
and few edits with missing/inconsistence of recorded audio tracks in Video 1 - SSU, Radio interception of
conversations between terrorists, "Boeing-777" plane crash.mp4. The edits, merging of other sources of
audios tracks and cuts were seen as below. Refer to Section 4.0.
a. In Audio 1, Track 1 - below are the edition/manipulation seen.
i. Refer to Figure 4.4.1.1
- Background noises appear in the V. Gernanin’s part of audio Track-1 (Left Channel) are different
at 0.18.5, 0:25.75 & 0:31:5. The noise is different suddenly once he starts to talk. The background
noise in between of phrases present in Audio 1- Track 1 between the duration of 0:19.5 and
0:25.5, between 0:26.8 and 0:31.4 and between 0:32.6 and 0:36.0.
- Arrows (bottom – up) showing merging of audios at 0:22.5, 0:23.5 and 0:30:5.
ii. Refer to Figure 4.4.1.2:
- Figure 4.4.1.2: A gap which appears at the end of third phrase ~0:32.6 uttered by V. Gernanin in
the audio Track-1 (Left Channel) is possible indication that Geranin voices are merged into the
conversation.
- Audio spectral at 0:31.75 – 0:31.85 (Left Channel) showing added cut, paste and merger of other
sound in this audio.
iii. Refer to Figure 4.4.1.3:
- Bezler’s voice audio Track 1 (Right Channel) have long pauses after each phrase, appears strange.
- Long pauses seen between 0:24.7 and 0:25.7, between 0:26.55 and 0:27.55, between 0:36 and
0:31.45, between 0:32.4 and 0:33.5
- Arrows in Left Channel showing merging of audios at 0:22.5, 0:23.5 and 0:30:5.
iv. Refer to Figure 4.4.1.4:
- Right Channel - It appears that the audio was cut down and merged at 0:23.20 from the end of a
conversation. Different audio conversation starts at 0:23.30.
- Left channel (arrow up-bottom) showing merging of audio at 0:23.43.
b. In Audio 2, Track 2 - below are the edition/manipulation seen.
i. Refer to Figure 4.4.2.1:
- SSU, radio interception of conversations between militants, Boeing-777 plane crash.mp4, Audio
2 and Track-2 conversation between
- Major and Grek audio duration between 0:43.3 – 0:52.9. Possible edit can be seen as the noise
level is different
141
c. In Audio 2, Track 3 - below are the edition/manipulation seen.
i. Refer to Figure 4.4.3.1
- In Audio 2, Track-3, background noises are not similar in this part from 0:58:75 and 0:59:0.
- At 0:58.85 another difference noise was seen.
ii. Refer to Figure 4.4.3.2
- In Audio 2, Track-3, possible edits can be seen between 1:03:85 and 1:04:55, background noise
suddenly appears from nowhere completely unrelated to the speakers’ background atmosphere.
d. In Audio 2, Track-4 - below are the edition/manipulation seen.
i. Refer to Figure 4.4.4.1
- In Audio 2, Track-4 possible edits can be seen between 1:13:55 and 1:13:5 and between 1:15:20
and 1:16:20
- Background noise suddenly appears from nowhere completely unrelated to the speakers’
atmosphere.
ii. Refer to Figure 4.4.4.2
- In Audio 2 Track-4, possible edits can be seen between 1:18:80 and 1:19:30
- Background noise suddenly appears from nowhere completely unrelated to the speakers’
atmosphere.
iii. Refer to Figure 4.4.4.3
- Failed to overlay the merging between time frame 1:24.20 and 1:24.30 another merging between
1:24.50 and 1:24.85.
- Hearing showing different speaker in this track,
iv. Refer to Figure 4.4.4.4
- A new person’s voice appears between 1:09.5 and 1:49.0. However, SBU stated that the
conversation was between Major and Grek.
e. Audio 3, Track-5 - below are the edition/manipulation seen.
i. Refer to Figure 4.4.5.1
- Audio 3 Track-5 begins from 1:50.2 and ends at 2:22.7. This segment of audio has 3 different
individual voices.
- Two different channel seen showing two difference source of audio recordings.
- it appears to be two different militants speaking to Kozitsyn.
- Cut of audio in Right channel at ~1:51.0 – 1:54.0, ~1:57.5-2:00.0, ~2:01.0-2:02.5, ~ 2:04.5-2:07.5
& ~2:10.5-2:12.0
ii. Refer to Figure 4.4.5.2
142
- Possible merging can be seen between 2:02.94 and 2:02.97 (Left Channel), also sudden difference
in the spectrum frequency
- from 2:02:98
iii. Refer to Figure 4.4.5.3
- Muffled and no background noise appears were seen between 1:50.2 and 1:53.6 (Right Channel).
- However, background noise appears normal after 1:53.8 till the end of the track. There are two
different channels in this track. Left Channel - (Arrow Up-Bottom) showing adding of audio
between ~2:12.6 and 2:14.2.
- Right Channel (Arrow Up-Bottom) showing merging ~2:12.3 until 2:22.28. This is clear
editing/adding of audios
Further analysis on the audio tracks were performed where set of voice samples were taken for details
voice analysis where comparison of voices can be performed to identify speakers on each audio track can
be identified if they are same speaker or different but unfortunately none of the voices are meeting the
requirement for voice biometric analysis/comparison as it has very short speech below 15 seconds and it
is the audio quality is low.
As a summary, all 5 audio tracks in the Video 1 - `SSU, Radio interception of conversations between
terrorists, "Boeing-777" plane crash’ published in YouTube by SSU is faked, tampered and not genuine.
Release the original and genuine audio tracks officially is highly recommended.
Refer to Section 1.7 showing the Executive Summary of the video and audio stream analysis and
Section 1.8 showing the Timeline of the Videos. Refer to Section 3.1 showing the Video File Analysis and
Statements and Section 3.2 showing Audio Track Analysis and Finding Statements for further reference.
143
7.0 Appendix
i. Reference of Video
Video 1 - SSU, radio interception of conversations between terrorists, "Boeing-777" plane crash
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbyZYgSXdyw
Video 2 - MH17 crash: leaked tape proven FAKE by audio analysis. Анализ перехвата разговоров
ополчения ДНР. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T34AB6CImTE
Refer to Table 2.1.1 and Table 2.2.1 for Video source and acquired videos details.
~END~
INTERNATIONAL PLATFORM
GLOBAL RIGHT OF PEACEFUL PEOPLE
MH17
3rd March 2020
Conway Hall, London
wwwogitforensics.com
An Independent Digital Forensic Investigative
DISCLAIMER
The information and contents of this document is confidential. It is intended
solely for the use of Bonanza Media and its appointed solicitor and appointed
other professionals. Save and except the forgoing any
photocopy/extraction/imaging without the permission of OG IT Forensic Services
is strictly prohibited. OG IT Forensic Services makes no representation or
warranties with the respect to the contents or use of this document, and
specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties or usefulness for any
particular purpose of this publication. OG IT Forensic Services reserve the right to
change or revise this document, at any time.
I confirm the correctness of my expert report and understand that in giving my
report my overriding duty is to the court and that I have complied with that duty.
DIGITAL AUDIO ACCEPTANCE AS DIGITAL
EVIDENCE
Any digital audio submission as digital evidence to court of law can only be accepted with
below requirement;
i. The source of origin media where the digital audio was recorded (Authenticity)
ii. The source of origin where digital audio was stored (storage of media) (Authenticity)
iii. The audio recording metadata (Details of when audio was recorded) (Authenticity)
iv. The acquisition of the audio must be done from the media / storage of the media
(Must be preserved)
v. The part of audio track can be extracted but it has to be clearly showing the source of
origin media, storage and audio details.
Confidential OG IT Forensic Services 3
ISO/IEC 27037.. Digital Forensics standards for good practice methods and processes for forensic
capture and investigation of digital evidence.
CAN THE PART OF AUDIO TRACK
EXPORTED FROM VIDEO?
The part of audio track can be extracted from video’s audio stream. The audio stream does maintain the sound waves,
spectrogram and the noise floor which can be used to analyse for tampering. This is regardless what codec has been converted.
A spectrogram is a visual representation of the spectrum of frequencies of a signal as it varies with time. When applied to an
audio signal, spectrograms/waveform are sometimes called sonographs, voiceprints, or voicegrams
It is important to have the source of origin media, storage and audio details as verification of the audio tracks.
“The Video - SSU, radio interception of conversations between terrorists, Boeing-777 plane crash” (source from uploaded YouTube
videos) analysis was focused more on the audio streams as the audio aired in the video was the intercepted recorded audio
conversations.
Spectogram Noise Floor
VIDEO FILES: VIDEO & AUDIO STREAM
Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'SSU, radio interception of
conversations between terrorists, Boeing-777 plane crash.mp4':
Duration: 00:02:23.77, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 190 kb/s
Stream #0.0(und): Video: h264, yuv420p, 480x360, 25 tbr, 25 tbn, 50 tbc
Stream #0.1(und): Audio: aac, 44100 Hz, stereo, s16
For the audio analysis, the audio stream - Stream #0.1(und): Audio: aac, 44100
Hz, stereo, s16 was taken for analysis into the forensic tool.
The audio channel is stereo, 44Khz and the audio code is AAC (Advance Audios
Coding).
Confidential OG IT Forensic Services 5
0.0
WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF THE AUDIO
TRACK COMING FROM ?
It is intercepted by some agencies….
This is using special audio interception devices by agencies..
There are special device used to intercept live phone calls or any radio transmission.
Agencies may have the vast intercept in the air where all the signal can be captured.
From my view on these intercepted audio track, I am seeing may background noise of people
talking…
So this clearly showing that these intercept calls were recorded, stored in a storage and then
the specific audio track were filtered with special filtration.
The filtration can capture the specific speaker, but it does leave some overlapping voices..
So, the reporting of how the source of audio track was obtain must be shown/documented &
presented.
Вы здесь » MH17: как и кто? » Против официальной версии » Макс + Яна MH17 - 5 years onv